26470 2014-07-30 12:07:00 +0000 Clarify behavior for gradientTransform and patternTransform 2017-01-13 18:07:48 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified CSS Transforms unspecified All All RESOLVED MOVED P2 normal --- 1 ed dschulze ayg cmarrin dino dschulze eoconnor smfr public-css-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 109564 0 ed 2014-07-30 12:07:00 +0000 I found http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transforms/#svg-gradient-transform-pattern-transform slightly confusing, as normally presentation attributes can be specified on any svg element (see https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/intro.html#TermPresentationAttribute). It seems the desire here is to break that convention, and regardless of the intention the behavior needs to be specified - to explicitly call out the difference(s) to other presentation attributes AND/OR to specify the order in which transform, patternTransform and gradientTransform are mapped if they're all specified on the same element. It's possible that the SVG2 spec will need to be updated as well, see https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/styling.html#UsingPresentationAttributes, since with the section in the Transforms spec a given presentation attribute and the corresponding property may no longer share the same name. 109620 1 smfr 2014-07-30 22:43:14 +0000 I know nothing about these kinds of transforms :) 109629 2 dschulze 2014-07-31 04:22:14 +0000 (In reply to Simon Fraser from comment #1) > I know nothing about these kinds of transforms :) I'll take care of the issue next week. 128383 3 smfr 2017-01-13 18:07:48 +0000 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/919