26388 2014-07-19 14:36:15 +0000 [XSLT30] Normative reference of XML Schema 1.1 and general references clean-up 2014-09-05 13:54:42 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XSLT 3.0 Last Call drafts PC Windows NT CLOSED DUPLICATE 25701 P2 normal --- 1 abel.braaksma mike public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 109105 0 abel.braaksma 2014-07-19 14:36:15 +0000 I noticed some inconsistencies and/or out-of-date issues with specs. I am not sure whether this was noted elsewhere already, if so, please consider this bug-report simply as a way to track its status. I used the latest internal working draft (member only) for reviewing the references and other sections. The text of section 4.1 XML Versions says the following: "The current version of [XML Schema Part 2] (that is, XSD 1.0) does not reference the XML 1.1 specifications. This means that datatypes such as xs:NCName and xs:ID are constrained by the XML 1.0 rules, and do not allow the full range of values permitted by XML 1.1. This situation will not be resolved until a new version of [XML Schema Part 2] becomes available; in the meantime, it is recommended that implementers wishing to support XML 1.1 should consult [XML Schema 1.0 and XML 1.1] for guidance. An XSLT 3.0 processor that supports XML 1.1 should implement the rules in later versions of [XML Schema Part 2] as they become available." XML Schema 1.1 is now a Recommendation and I think this section needs cleaning up, because XSD 1.1 does reference XML 1.1 normatively. Under A.1 Normative References there are a few references that I think need updating: > Data Model > XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 3.0, Norman Walsh, John Snelson, Editors. > World Wide Web Consortium, 22 October 2013. This version is > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-xpath-datamodel-30-20131022/. The latest version > is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel-30/. XDM 3.0 is now a Recommendation, there is no need anymore to link to the PR edition. > Functions and Operators > XQuery and XPath Functions and Operators 3.0, Michael Kay, Editor. World > Wide Web Consortium, 22 October 2013. This version is > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-xpath-functions-30-20131022/. The latest version > is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions-30/. F&O 3.0 is now a recommendation, there is no need anymore to link to the PR edition. > ISO 15924 > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Information and > documentation — Codes for the representation of names of scripts ISO > 15924:2004, January 2004. This reference does not have a normative link. The next reference normatively links to the Codes Register. A candidate for a normative link might be the original document on ISO.org: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:15924:ed-1:v1:en. > XSLT and XQuery Serialization > XSLT and XQuery Serialization 3.0, Henry Zongaro, Editor. World Wide Web > Consortium, 22 October 2013. This version is > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-xslt-xquery-serialization-30-20131022/. The > latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-xquery-serialization-30/. Serialization 3.0 is now a Recommendation, there is no need anymore to link to the PR edition. > XML Schema > World Wide Web Consortium. XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 1: > Structures. W3C Working Draft 3 December 2009. See > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/ XML Schema 1.1 (perhaps the title should reflect the version?) is now a Recommendation, the text "W3C Working Draft 3 December 2009" is outdated. The link is still correct, but there is no "this version" reference. It should probably be "http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xmlschema11-1-20120405/" for "this version". > XPath 3.0 > XML Path Language (XPath) 3.0, Jonathan Robie, Don Chamberlin, Michael Dyck, > John Snelson, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 22 October 2013. This > version is http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-xpath-30-20131022/. The latest > version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-30/. XPath 3.0 is now a Recommendation, there is no need anymore to link to the PR edition. A.2 Other references > XLink > XML Linking Language (XLink) Version 1.0, Steven DeRose, David Orchard, and > Eve Maler, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 27 Jun 2001. This version is > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xlink-20010627/. The latest version is > available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/. There is now a new version of XLink, XLink 1.1, available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink11/ (a Rec since 2010). Not sure we need to link to the 1.1 version, I am not acquainted with the changes. > XML Schema 1.0 and XML 1.1 > World Wide Web Consortium. Processing XML 1.1 documents with XML Schema 1.0 > processors. W3C Working Group Note 11 May 2005. See > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-xml11schema10-20050511/ Perhaps with the advent of XML Schema 1.1, we can (normatively?) require that XML 1.1 processors use XML Schema 1.1? Not sure of the implications though. > XSLFO Does it make sense to (also) link to XSL-FO 2.0 at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20/? It is in Draft and I've heard that it may stay in Draft for the foreseeable future by lack of members. 109107 1 mike 2014-07-19 14:55:25 +0000 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 25701 ***