26267 2014-07-04 17:20:10 +0000 role=grid without child role=rowgroup or row not flagged as an error 2015-07-21 03:18:17 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML Checker General unspecified PC Windows NT NEW P2 normal --- 1 faulkner.steve mike+validator faulkner.steve mike www-validator-cvs oldest_to_newest 108729 0 faulkner.steve 2014-07-04 17:20:10 +0000 Grid - Required Owned Elements: row rowgroup → row http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/roles#grid 108730 1 faulkner.steve 2014-07-04 17:42:35 +0000 test case http://stevefaulkner.github.io/html-mapping-tests/aria-tests/grid.html 108741 2 mike 2014-07-06 13:18:14 +0000 Will try to check on this this week. But if I forget please remind me 109929 3 mike 2014-08-05 12:30:00 +0000 As far as the cases in the file at http://stevefaulkner.github.io/html-mapping-tests/aria-tests/grid.html the ARIA spec doesn't define "role=grid with no rows or rowgroups inside" as invalid, as far as I can tell. I notice that the ARIA spec has a note that says, "A role that has 'required owned elements' does not imply the reverse relationship. While processing of a role may be incomplete without elements of given roles present as descendants, elements with roles in this list do not always have to be found within elements of the given role." As far as the "must be owned by" requirements in the ARIA spec, I believe the validator is already correctly checking all of those.