26243 2014-06-30 21:15:41 +0000 Do we need getUserMedia() on MediaDevices? 2014-08-22 08:54:34 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebRTC Working Group Media Capture and Streams unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 shijuns adam.bergkvist adam.bergkvist public-media-capture stefan.lk.hakansson oldest_to_newest 108514 0 shijuns 2014-06-30 21:15:41 +0000 Open a bug to track the topic on the mailing list. In the latest version of the draft, there are two ways to call getUserMedia() within the NavigatorUserMedia. #1: NavigatorUserMedia.getUserMedia(); #2: NavigatorUserMedia.MediaDevices.getUserMedia(); Based on previous discussions on the mailing list, a good reason to keep NavigatorUserMedia.getUserMedia() is that there are implementations and sites using it already. Although MediaDevices.getUserMedia() looks nicer, but there seems no clear value keeping two options. 108563 1 adam.bergkvist 2014-07-01 08:18:47 +0000 Yes, we should probably only have one option in the spec, but I guess implementations will leave the vendor prefixed getUserMedia() on NavigatorUserMedia regardless if we move the function to MediaDevices or not. 108752 2 stefan.lk.hakansson 2014-07-07 13:04:30 +0000 Sent a mail to the list on July 7th to get more input. 110449 3 stefan.lk.hakansson 2014-08-22 06:02:43 +0000 The conclusion of the list discussion is that there should be only one way: #2: NavigatorUserMedia.MediaDevices.getUserMedia(); Assigning for editing. 110454 4 adam.bergkvist 2014-08-22 08:54:34 +0000 Proposed fix: https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/commit/30c1812084ceee87761f2ee4af9a123b0a604ec6