26189 2014-06-24 20:30:55 +0000 Parser: <rb> and <rtc> (update parsing algorithm, and add the elements to the language/spec) 2015-09-04 11:32:15 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED MOVED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#non-conforming-features spec_lags_implementation P3 normal 2016 Q1 25555 1 contributor ian annevk ian mike w3 contributor oldest_to_newest 108294 0 contributor 2014-06-24 20:30:55 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/obsolete.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#non-conforming-features Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#non-conforming-features Referrer: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/index.html Comment: what about <rtc>? See also https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26187 Posted from: 50.163.53.37 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.84 Safari/537.36 108295 1 w3 2014-06-24 20:33:31 +0000 To elaborate: <rb> is listed explicitly as a "non-conforming" feature. Is <rtc> non-conforming as well? (The parsing of these tags differ between the W3C and WHATWG specs, see https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26187 ). 108322 2 w3 2014-06-25 15:06:40 +0000 Support for parsing <rb> and <rtc> has landed in webkit (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131175) and gecko (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664104). Are there any technical objections to adding these to the WHATWG spec? 108324 3 w3 2014-06-25 15:12:09 +0000 *** Bug 26187 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 108326 4 ian 2014-06-25 15:30:03 +0000 <rtc> didn't exist until some browsers added it, that's why it wasn't listed as obsolete. There are arguments against it, see bug 20114 and bug 20115. However, if browsers are ignoring the spec and implementing it anyway, then it's time to ignore whether it's a good idea or not, and spec it because it's reality... 108351 5 ian 2014-06-25 18:46:08 +0000 If browsers do decide to continue down this flawed path, here's a few tests (though given the complexity of ruby in the HTML spec I imagine we'll need many more): https://github.com/html5lib/html5lib-tests/pull/27/files 123076 6 annevk 2015-09-04 11:32:15 +0000 https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/101