26013 2014-06-08 00:39:06 +0000 Note in "10 Pointer Capture" to mention implicit pointer capture 2014-07-15 15:40:55 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified PointerEventsWG Pointer Events specification unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 redux jrossi public-pointer-events public-pointer-events-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 107473 0 redux 2014-06-08 00:39:06 +0000 As discussed on list http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014AprJun/0087.html I'd propose adding a note to "10. Pointer Capture" in the introductory section, after Fig 4: (slightly altered from my original suggestion) "NOTE: browsers MAY implement their own implicit pointer capture behaviour - for instance, for touch interactions, a browser may automatically capture the pointer as part of a tap on a native form control (such as a button) to improve user interaction (allowing some finger movement to stray outside of the form control itself during the tap action). As part of this behaviour, browsers MAY fire <code>gotpointercapture</code> and <code>lostpointercapture</code> events, even though no explicit pointer capture functions (<code>setPointerCapture</code> and <code>releasePointerCapture</code>) were called." 108944 1 jrossi 2014-07-15 15:24:10 +0000 Added as discussed: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/rev/a6cecf9cf6bc The only change I made to the proposed text was to remove RFC2119 keywords since this is a note. Let me know if you see any issues with the text. 108945 2 redux 2014-07-15 15:27:23 +0000 Two minor queries on this: - "Implicit Set of Pointer Capture" read slightly awkward. Could it be changed to "Implicit Pointer Capture" (as the text also deals with the implicit release of pointer capture, not just setting) - Should this be in an informative NOTE ? 108948 3 jrossi 2014-07-15 15:35:09 +0000 Changing the title seems good. It already is in an informative note. I just put a heading above it to match the flow of implicit release of capture (and to get an entry in the ToC). 108949 4 jrossi 2014-07-15 15:38:22 +0000 Ah, I think I understand what you mean better now. How does this change look? https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/rev/f260a1e7545b 108950 5 redux 2014-07-15 15:40:55 +0000 Ah sorry, missed that it was already a note. Yup, all looks good to me now :)