<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2557</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-11-29 23:30:52 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>namespace of attributes</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-07-21 17:45:36 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>ITS</product>
          <component>ITS tagset</component>
          <version>WorkingDraft</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>PublicationFebruar20</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sebastian Rahtz">sebastian.rahtz</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="ITS mailing-list">public-i18n-its</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7286</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sebastian Rahtz">sebastian.rahtz</who>
    <bug_when>2005-11-29 23:30:52 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>If the attributes are really to be in the ITS namespace, they each need to be
explicitly taggged as such. This is done by adding
 ns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its&quot;
to each &lt;attDef&gt; in the ODD source. Doing this makes
some of the examples valid, at the cost of making others invalid!

On the whole, its probably sensible to always use the namespace,
even in dislocated contexts where it seems redundant.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7705</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2006-01-08 04:37:29 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Resolution of the WG at the Oxford f2f (december 2005): all attributes will be
qualified.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>