25410 2014-04-22 12:43:26 +0000 Why is zero tokens in rel allowed? 2014-05-14 12:47:50 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED WORKSFORME http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attr-link-rel P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian ian mike zcorpan contributor oldest_to_newest 104164 0 contributor 2014-04-22 12:43:26 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#attr-link-rel Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#attr-link-rel Referrer: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/ Comment: Why is zero tokens in rel allowed? Posted from: 2a00:801:e0:30:514b:81c2:3d3e:2c7d by simonp@opera.com User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.76 Safari/537.36 OPR/21.0.1432.31 (Edition Next) 104180 1 ian 2014-04-22 18:24:33 +0000 Given rel="foo": relList.remove('foo'); ...leaves an empty rel="". Seems weird that that would be non-conforming. 104220 2 zcorpan 2014-04-22 22:14:52 +0000 I don't follow. When would you want to do that? 105899 3 ian 2014-05-13 19:22:21 +0000 For example in a blog editor, where you're changing the link to have or not have rel=external as the user decides what the link should point to. 105960 4 zcorpan 2014-05-14 12:47:50 +0000 Hmm. OK.