<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>25407</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2014-04-21 20:30:51 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>To improve interop, allow &lt;meta&gt; refresh content attribute to have &quot;url=&quot; part optional</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2016-04-25 20:29:36 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>HTML5 spec</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows NT</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>whatwg-resolved</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P0</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Travis Leithead [MSFT]">travil</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="This bug has no owner yet - up for the taking">dave.null</assigned_to>
          <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
    
    <cc>zcorpan</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>104120</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Travis Leithead [MSFT]">travil</who>
    <bug_when>2014-04-21 20:30:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>From a live site issue, we found that to be interoperable with Firefox and Chrome, we have to make the &quot;url=&quot; part of the content attribute optional. For example, sites will have the following syntax and expect to be &quot;refreshed&quot; to the specified URL:

&lt;meta http-equiv=&quot;refresh&quot; content=&quot;0;https://sourceforge.net/&quot; /&gt;

Per the current spec text (steps 12-17 of the meta refresh processing steps (http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/document-metadata.html#attr-meta-http-equiv-refresh)

     &quot;If the character in input pointed to by position
     is a &quot;U&quot; (U+0055) character or a U+0075 LATIN SMALL LETTER U character
     (u), then advance position to the next character. Otherwise, jump to the
     last step.

     If the character in input pointed to by position
     is a &quot;R&quot; (U+0052) character or a U+0072 LATIN SMALL LETTER R character
     (r), then advance position to the next character. Otherwise, jump to the
     last step.

     If the character in input pointed to by position
     is s &quot;L&quot; (U+004C) character or a U+006C LATIN SMALL LETTER L character
     (l), then advance position to the next character. Otherwise, jump to the
     last step.

     Skip whitespace.

     If the character in input pointed to by position
     is a &quot;=&quot; (U+003D), then advance position to the next character.
     Otherwise, jump to the last step.

     Skip whitespace.&quot;

Jumping to the last step means that no url is parsed and the wrong thing happens. These steps need to be optional and still allow a URL following the number token to be parsed.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>121033</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2015-06-16 10:08:22 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Agree that it would be good to have a spec change here, and raising priority after reviewing implementer feedback.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>123803</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Pieters">zcorpan</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-20 12:07:53 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/246</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>123804</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Pieters">zcorpan</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-20 12:09:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hmm, reopening since this wasn&apos;t the whatwg component.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>124260</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Pieters">zcorpan</who>
    <bug_when>2015-11-18 21:40:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(PR merged in whatwg/html)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>126122</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Travis Leithead [MSFT]">travil</who>
    <bug_when>2016-04-25 20:29:36 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Yea! Fixed via WHATWG PR.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>