<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>25398</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2014-04-21 12:03:45 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>REV attribute marked as obsolete in HTML 5 CR, but allowed by RDFa REC</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2016-04-25 20:25:40 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>HTML5 spec</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows NT</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>MOVED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>editorial</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Mark Rogers">mark.rogers</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="This bug has no owner yet - up for the taking">dave.null</assigned_to>
          <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
    
    <cc>travil</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>104104</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Rogers">mark.rogers</who>
    <bug_when>2014-04-21 12:03:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>There&apos;s a contradiction between the HTML 5 CR and the RDFa Core 1.1 over the status of the REV attribute

From HTML5 CR and 5.1 nightly:

11.2 Non-conforming features&quot;
&quot;The following attributes are obsolete (though the elements are still part of the language), and must not be used by authors:
&quot;rev on a elements&quot;
&quot;rev on link elements

RDFa Core 1.1 - Second Edition says:

&quot;RDFa supports the use of @rel and @rev on any element&quot;

http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdfa-core-20130822/#examples
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdfa-core-20130822/#A-rev

&gt;On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Michael[tm] Smith &lt;mike@w3.org&gt; wrote:
&gt;The validator now accepts full RDFa 1.1 markup in HTML documents.

On 04/18/2014, Sum Ruby wrote:
&gt;To clear up future confusion, consider filing a new bug and 
&gt;pointing to the following comment:
&gt;https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21341#c8

This is certainly confusing at the moment. Removing REV from the list of obsolete attributes in HTML 5 seems like the simplest, lowest impact fix.

Best Regards
Mark

Mark Rogers - mark.rogers@powermapper.com
PowerMapper Software Ltd - www.powermapper.com 
Registered in Scotland No 362274 Quartermile 2 Edinburgh EH3 9GL</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>107338</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Robin Berjon">robin</who>
    <bug_when>2014-06-05 12:19:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Thanks, I&apos;ve removed it from the list of obsolete attributes in CR. I&apos;m keeping this bug open because the change will have to be ported to master.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>126120</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Travis Leithead [MSFT]">travil</who>
    <bug_when>2016-04-25 20:25:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>HTML5.1 Bugzilla Bug Triage: Moved to https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/256

If this resolution is not satisfactory, please copy the relevant bug details/proposal into a new issue at the W3C HTML5 Issue tracker: https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/new where it will be re-triaged. Thanks!</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>