25281 2014-04-06 22:06:26 +0000 Incorrect outline in last sample outline 2014-04-18 01:52:12 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG HTML5 spec unspecified PC All RESOLVED WONTFIX P2 normal --- 1 jason faulkner.steve faulkner.steve mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 103461 0 jason 2014-04-06 22:06:26 +0000 Shouldn't the outline for the last example in 4.3.10.2 Sample outlines be as follows? <ol class="brief"> <li> Ray's blog <ol class="brief"> <li> <i>Untitled article</i> <ol class="brief"> <li><i>Untitled navigation section</i> </li> <li> We're adopting a child!</li> </ol> </li> </ol> </li> </ol> In other words, aren't the <nav> and the H2's implied section at the same level within the <article>? 104020 1 faulkner.steve 2014-04-17 09:15:15 +0000 Hi Jason, no, but it is a little confusing, its easier to understand if you add headings to reflect the nesting structure. the <nav> is a subsection of the article <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>Test</title> </head> <body> <h1>Ray's blog</h1> <main> <article> <header> <h2>article heading</h2> <nav> <h3>nav heading</h3> <a href="?t=-1d">Yesterday</a>; <a href="?t=-7d">Last week</a>; <a href="?t=-1m">Last month</a> </nav> </header> <h2>We're adopting a child!</h2> <p>As of today, Janine and I have signed the papers to become the proud parents of baby Diane! We've been looking forward to this day for weeks.</p> </article> </main> </body> </html> resulting outline: Ray's blog article heading nav heading We're adopting a child! 104062 2 jason 2014-04-18 01:52:12 +0000 Thanks, Steve. I get that the <nav> is a subsection of the <article>, but was confused about the second <h2>. Working with your modified example, I guess the second <h2>, being of equal rank with the first <h2>, starts a new implied section in the outline. That implied section reflects content that is nested within the <article> in the DOM tree, but it is not part of the outline section established by the <article> and its first <h2>. Is that right? Anyway, no need to waste time on this for my sake. I've happily resigned myself to not fully understanding the algorithm, which is fine as long it remains unimplemented.