<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2518</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-11-13 09:09:47 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Feature request: allow XInclude and xml:*</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-03-31 15:56:56 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Query Test Suite</product>
          <component>XML Query Test Suite</component>
          <version>0.8.0</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>INVALID</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Frans Englich">frans.englich</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Andrew Eisenberg">andrew.eisenberg</assigned_to>
          
          
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7171</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Frans Englich">frans.englich</who>
    <bug_when>2005-11-13 09:09:47 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hello,  
  
I would find the XQTS test suite even more useful if XQTSCatalog.xsd allow the  
xml:* and XInclude vocabulary.  
  
As a wish, support on all elements. And if that&apos;s not possible for some reason, 
the central/major elements.  
 
From my perspective I don&apos;t see a reason to do the same with Results.xsd, but 
one thing&apos;s certain: to add xml:* and XInclude support to Results.xsd now, 
would ensure the format wouldn&apos;t be constraining the day one do need it. 
 
  
Cheers,  
Frans</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>8836</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Andrew Eisenberg">andrew.eisenberg</who>
    <bug_when>2006-03-22 21:49:09 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Frans, you say that broadening the catalog schema in this way would make the test suite more useful. Please expand on this. As you can imagine, our resources are not without limit.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>8994</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Frans Englich">frans.englich</who>
    <bug_when>2006-03-31 15:47:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>
The idea is this: by making the catalog format more practical, powerful, and flexible, it increases the chances of people using it for test harnesses, and therefore increases the chances of test case submissions and that people actually run the XQTS.

However, after starting to patch XQTSCatalog.xsd I realized, considering technical issues which are not so obvious and your limited resources, that it doesn&apos;t make sense, and therefore I decide to withdraw this comment.

Nevertheless, I&apos;ll attach the patch for (any) future reference.


Sorry for the noise,
Frans
</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>