<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>25040</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2014-03-13 12:12:20 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[OMA-PUSH] reference should be more specific</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2015-10-06 11:29:39 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebAppsWG</product>
          <component>Push API</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>INVALID</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Arthur Barstow">art.barstow</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Bryan Sullivan">bs3131</assigned_to>
          <cc>art.barstow</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-webapps-bugzilla</cc>
          
          <qa_contact>public-webapps-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>102301</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Arthur Barstow">art.barstow</who>
    <bug_when>2014-03-13 12:12:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The Push API&apos;s [OMA-PUSH] reference is &lt;http://technical.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/release_program/push_v2_3.aspx&gt; and that resource lists over 25 documents including over 10 specifications. This seems too &quot;loose&quot; for a Normative reference and as such the specific document(s) should be identified. 

On the other hand, if the intent is for this reference to be non-normative, the reference is probably ok but the reference should be moved to the Informative references section i.e. section B.2.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>102726</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2014-03-21 06:03:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to Art Barstow from comment #0)
&gt; The Push API&apos;s [OMA-PUSH] reference is
&gt; &lt;http://technical.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/release_program/push_v2_3.
&gt; aspx&gt; and that resource lists over 25 documents including over 10
&gt; specifications. This seems too &quot;loose&quot; for a Normative reference and as such
&gt; the specific document(s) should be identified. 
&gt; 
&gt; On the other hand, if the intent is for this reference to be non-normative,
&gt; the reference is probably ok but the reference should be moved to the
&gt; Informative references section i.e. section B.2.

Yes, as should a number of other things are currently listed as normative refs. See bug 25108.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>123514</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Arthur Barstow">art.barstow</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-06 11:29:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The Push API spec no longer references OMA specs so this bug is now considered invalid &lt;https://w3c.github.io/push-api/#references&gt;.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>