24530 2014-02-05 20:56:40 +0000 Missing streamability result for xsl:map 2014-02-17 13:17:00 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XSLT 3.0 Last Call drafts PC Windows NT CLOSED FIXED P2 minor --- 1 abel.braaksma mike cmsmcq public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 99823 0 abel.braaksma 2014-02-05 20:56:40 +0000 Under 19.8.4.22 Streamability of xsl:map (http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-30/#streamability-xsl-map) there are two numbered items, the first applying to xsl:map having only xsl:map-entry instructions. I think that we should split up the first item and write something along the lines that we do for similar instructions to make it clearer what happens: 1. If the sequence constructor within the instruction consists exclusively of xsl:map-entry instructions (and xsl:fallback instructions, which are ignored), the first of the following applies: a) if any of the xsl:map-entry children is roaming and/or free-ranging, then the posture and sweep are roaming and free-ranging. b) otherwise, the posture is grounded and the sweep is the widest sweep of the xsl:map-entry children, where the ordering of increasing width is motionless, consuming, free-ranging. I know this is purely editorial, and one could argue that rule #2 already covers this 1.a. version, but I believe it is clearer this way and more in line with other rules. Note also the addition of the ordering of the sweep, which is copied to many other rules already (which, as it turns out, mentions free-ranging, even though free-ranging is often no option anymore at that stage, leaving only motionless and consuming). 100371 1 cmsmcq 2014-02-12 09:37:34 +0000 The WG discussed this during the ftf meeting in Prague and decided to leave this change to the discretion of the editor. 100747 2 mike 2014-02-17 13:17:00 +0000 Resolved as suggested in the original post.