<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2453</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-11-04 13:51:51 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Wrt simpleType, which Part has which subsections normative</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-09-20 23:09:19 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Datatypes: XSD Part 2</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2005/09/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html#d0e2196</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7034</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</who>
    <bug_when>2005-11-04 13:51:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>&quot;[wrt section] 4.1.3 will come back to question of normativity between parts 1 and 2</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7447</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2005-12-15 00:25:43 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>We should treat the question of what is normative where
broadly, to make sure we have a coherent overall story
about what is where, and why.

(In particular, we should focus not just on 4.1.3 but
also include at least 4.1.5 in the discussion.)
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>7524</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</who>
    <bug_when>2005-12-19 15:58:03 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Bug 2315 is a version of this one</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>11898</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-20 23:09:19 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This issue was resolved by the adoption of the &apos;1852 proposal&apos; at
the Working Group&apos;s face to face meeting of January 2006 in
St. Petersburg.  The resolution is reflected in the last call
working draft of 17 February 2006.

This issue should have been mark as RESOLVED / FIXED at that
time, but apparently was not.  I am marking it that way now, to
reduce confusion.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>