<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>24493</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2014-02-05 01:22:25 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>xsl:merge streamability rules: roaming and free-ranging</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2014-02-24 15:52:34 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XSLT 3.0</component>
          <version>Last Call drafts</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows NT</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Abel Braaksma">abel.braaksma</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Michael Kay">mike</assigned_to>
          <cc>cmsmcq</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>99722</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Abel Braaksma">abel.braaksma</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-05 01:22:25 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Perhaps this section (15.4) should better go under section 19? But I believe this was discussed already at the latest telcon.

See also bug 24343 which is related.

The guaranteed streamability rules do not say anything when the rules are not met. A line similar to rules elsewhere &quot;Otherwise, the construct is roaming and free-ranging&quot;. However, only if the attribute streamable=yes is supplied.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>100263</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-11 12:05:08 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>We discussed this in Prague.

With regard to the first issue, we noted that section 19.10 does have a sort of top-level launch pad for all guaranteed-streamability analysis.  

- It would be helpful to have hyperlinks from the first numbered list in 19.10 to the appropriate subsections (e.g. 15.4 and 18.2.7).

- It might be helpful to hyperlink to 19.10 from the opening paragraphs of 19.

We are not inclined to pull 15.4 and 18.2.7 etc. into section 19.

On the issue in the third paragraph, we concluded that no catch-all final clause is actually needed; the work it would do is handled by the following paragraph.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>100969</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-20 16:53:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 24494 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>