24475 2014-02-03 03:54:40 +0000 StorageQuota.supportedTypes should return a frozen Array 2015-04-01 13:42:42 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebAppsWG Quota Management API unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 kinuko kinuko art.barstow d mike nhiroki public-webapps public-webapps-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 99593 0 kinuko 2014-02-03 03:54:40 +0000 Adding a simple method like isSupportedType(type) might be easier / more convenient in real usage? 99594 1 d 2014-02-03 04:03:54 +0000 Alternately you could use the fruits of https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23682 and use a frozen array. That's option A in the original post there; according to https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23682#c7 the resulting syntax is going to be [SameObject] readonly attribute frozen array<StorageType> supportedTypes; 99595 2 kinuko 2014-02-03 04:24:38 +0000 Thanks for the suggestion, I just skimmed through the issue and it looks returning a frozen JS array perfectly makes sense in our case. I'll update the spec to use [SameObject] (and 'frozen' when we have it in IDL) if it gets no objections. 99596 3 kinuko 2014-02-03 04:26:06 +0000 Updating the subject for clarification. 119181 4 art.barstow 2015-04-01 13:42:42 +0000 It appears Kinuko fixed this on Github via Issue <https://github.com/kinu/quota-api/issues/3> and commit <https://github.com/kinu/quota-api/issues/3#ref-commit-b1b0c63>. Do you agree Kinuko and Domenic? Kinuko, BTW, now that you are using GH for this spec <>, perhaps this Bugzilla component should be: marked as "Historical", the component no longer accept new bugs and Github Issues be used exclusively for this spec. WDYT? If you agree, I'll work with W3C staff to make this happen.