24394 2014-01-25 15:19:42 +0000 non-ARIA role values are flagged as an error and should be a warning 2014-01-25 15:19:42 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML Checker General unspecified Other All NEW P2 normal --- 1 shane mike+validator www-validator-cvs oldest_to_newest 99078 0 shane 2014-01-25 15:19:42 +0000 The W3C ARIA specification [1] refers to the W3C Role Attribute Recommendation [2] for the definition of the role attribute. ARIA also defines a collection of role values that have specific semantics, and only those values are passed through to underlying accessibility technologies [4]. Therefore, if an element has <foo role="unknown known" then the role of "known" is the "ARIA role". Today the validator correctly flags the value of "unknown" in this example as an error. However, the Role Attribute Recommendation allows for additional vocabularies to be defined as long as those vocabularies are scoped as full URIs or as a CURIE. Consequently, an element like <foo prefix="dc: http://purl.org/dc/terms/" role="dc:description dc:title known"> is 1) valid and 2) has a valid ARIA role that would be passed to the underlying accessibility technology layer. My request is that the validator either 1) ignore role values that match the pattern for CURIE or FullURI, or 2) change the current error to a warning - as in "warning, the values dc:description and dc:title are non-ARIA values, and will therefore be ignored by ARIA user agents." (Note - technically the @prefix in the example above is not required, since there are some prefixes that are automatically defined in the RDFa Initial Context [3] - it is included for completeness) [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria/roles [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/role-attribute/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core/Overview.html#s_initialcontexts [4] http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab