2433 2005-11-03 12:00:38 +0000 {primitive type definition} mapping rule misleading 2005-12-28 01:23:10 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2005/09/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html#d0e657 resolved P2 normal --- 1 ht cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 7005 0 ht 2005-11-03 12:00:38 +0000 Mapping rules as changed by rec12-map got primitive type defintion wrong Fix agreed at f2f 2005-09-26 7553 1 cmsmcq 2005-12-28 01:21:38 +0000 As near as I can tell from the opaque description of this issue, it was intended to be used to track the decision to recast the description of the {primitive type definition} mapping in Datatypes 4.1.2. The wording agreed on in Edinburgh was "If the corresponding datatype is ·special· or ·primitive·, then as specified in Built-in Simple Type Definitions (§4.1.6), otherwise, among the ancestors of this STD, that STD which corresponds to a primitive datatype." This wording was integrated into the status quo document on 8 December 2005, so I'm marking this resolved.