24301 2014-01-15 15:55:29 +0000 Provide ImageData constructor. 2014-03-23 01:55:27 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#imagedata P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian annevk cabanier ian mike VYV03354 contributor oldest_to_newest 98506 0 contributor 2014-01-15 15:55:29 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/ Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#imagedata Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#imagedata Referrer: Comment: Provide ImageData constructor. Posted from: 207.218.72.65 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.18 Safari/537.36 98507 1 annevk 2014-01-15 15:56:45 +0000 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13626465/how-to-create-a-new-imagedata-object-independently should not be that hard. The obvious way to do things should work. I think making it accept a dictionary as single argument where you can specify the various features makes the most sense. W3C HTML has this apparently and Gecko is planning on adding something: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=959958 98525 2 contributor 2014-01-15 22:07:02 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r8397. Check-in comment: Add a couple of ImageData() constructors, and (in order to make that feasible) drop all the HD stuff on <canvas>. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=8396&to=8397 102796 3 cabanier 2014-03-23 01:55:27 +0000 (In reply to contributor from comment #2) > Checked in as WHATWG revision r8397. > Check-in comment: Add a couple of ImageData() constructors, and (in order to > make that feasible) drop all the HD stuff on <canvas>. > http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=8396&to=8397 Wasn't the HD stuff removed a while ago? I wonder how it snuck back into the spec.