24273 2014-01-11 22:22:57 +0000 Consider allowing the nohref attribute on area elements 2014-02-24 10:06:40 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG HTML5 spec unspecified Macintosh Mac System 9.x RESOLVED WONTFIX http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/the-map-element#the-area-element a11y P3 normal --- 13814 1 xn--mlform-iua faulkner.steve faulkner.steve ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking xn--mlform-iua public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 98288 0 xn--mlform-iua 2014-01-11 22:22:57 +0000 Whenever an <area> element has an @alt attribute but does not have a @href attribute, the validator screams that @href is lacking. Thus, @nohref is needed to signal to the validator that the the curren element is not meant to have a href attribute. 98292 1 xn--mlform-iua 2014-01-11 22:59:39 +0000 Btw, as I noted in bug 13814, then, in Firefox, the <area> elements are included in the tabbing order even if the element lacks both @alt and @href. 98295 2 faulkner.steve 2014-01-12 11:45:44 +0000 (In reply to Leif Halvard Silli from comment #0) > Whenever an <area> element has an @alt attribute but does not have a @href > attribute, the validator screams that @href is lacking. > > Thus, @nohref is needed to signal to the validator that the the curren > element is not meant to have a href attribute. adding an attribute for this seems OTT, why not make it conforming to have <area alt="blah"> ? 98308 3 mike 2014-01-12 17:55:36 +0000 (In reply to Leif Halvard Silli from comment #0) > Whenever an <area> element has an @alt attribute but does not have a @href > attribute, the validator screams that @href is lacking. Yeah, that's intentional, because the spec says, "If the area element has no href attribute... the alt attribute must be omitted." > Thus, @nohref is needed to signal to the validator that the the curren > element is not meant to have a href attribute. No, the fact that the element doesn't have an href attribute signals to the validator that the element doesn't have an href attribute. No @nohref attribute is needed. 98316 4 faulkner.steve 2014-01-13 09:45:15 +0000 (In reply to Michael[tm] Smith from comment #3) > (In reply to Leif Halvard Silli from comment #0) > > Whenever an <area> element has an @alt attribute but does not have a @href > > attribute, the validator screams that @href is lacking. > > Yeah, that's intentional, because the spec says, "If the area element has no > href attribute... the alt attribute must be omitted." what would be useful is to know why the spec says this. 101226 5 faulkner.steve 2014-02-24 10:06:40 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: rejected Change Description: no change Rationale: agreed with Comment 3 "No, the fact that the element doesn't have an href attribute signals to the validator that the element doesn't have an href attribute. No @nohref attribute is needed."