<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2424</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-10-29 07:36:50 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[XSLT 2.0] definition of alphanumeric in xsl:number format attribute</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-02-25 23:57:35 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XSLT 2.0</component>
          <version>Last Call drafts</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>LATER</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Colin Adams">colin</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Michael Kay">mike</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>6965</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Colin Adams">colin</who>
    <bug_when>2005-10-29 07:36:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I note that the definition of alphanumeric given for the format attribute does
not include all characters with the Unicode Alphabetic property.
Maybe the WG has already considered this, but I thought I&apos;d draw attention to it.

I&apos;m raising this now, rather than waiting for the CR to be issued, so I don&apos;t
forget it later.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>6966</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2005-10-29 09:10:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The definition of alphanumeric (all characters in the Unicode letter and number
gorups) is unchanged since XSLT 1.0, and I&apos;m not aware that it has caused any
problems. I don&apos;t think the WG has ever reviewed the definition.

The characters that are classified as alphabetic but not letters seem to consist
mainly of combining marks and signs, such as vowel signs. I&apos;ve personally no
knowledge of whether such marks and signs are ever used in numbering sequences.
However, they are currently allowed in the format pattern as separator
characters, and if we moved them to the &quot;alphanumeric&quot; category then it seems we
would not only be creating a theoretical backwards incompatibility, we might
also be removing functionality. So I don&apos;t think we can consider doing this
without strong evidence that there is a practical need; and even if there is
such a need, I think we could justify making it a &quot;version 3&quot; requirement rather
than trying to squeeze a late change into 2.0.

Michael Kay
(personal response)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>6973</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2005-10-31 13:22:32 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Resolution changed to &quot;LATER&quot; for scheduling purposes.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>14184</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Jim Melton">jim.melton</who>
    <bug_when>2007-02-25 23:57:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Closing bug because commenter has not objected to the resolution posted and more than two weeks have passed.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>