<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>24084</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2013-12-13 01:48:14 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Specify Selection.containsNode</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2014-09-16 15:44:35 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebAppsWG</product>
          <component>HISTORICAL - Selection API</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Ehsan Akhgari [:ehsan]">ehsan</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Ryosuke Niwa">rniwa</assigned_to>
          <cc>benjamp</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-webapps</cc>
    
    <cc>rniwa</cc>
          
          <qa_contact>public-webapps-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>97566</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Ehsan Akhgari [:ehsan]">ehsan</who>
    <bug_when>2013-12-13 01:48:14 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Gecko and Blink both implement it.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>103331</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Aryeh Gregor">ayg</who>
    <bug_when>2014-04-03 12:25:14 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Ugh, boolean parameter.  Could we change the API here instead of speccing it as-is?  Range already has intersectsNode(), so if this functionality is desired, I would like to copy the intersectsNode() method to Selection, then add containsNode() to both Range and Selection with no second parameter (only returns true if fully contained).

CCing Ryosuke because he was interested in taking over Selection.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>104126</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Ben Peters">benjamp</who>
    <bug_when>2014-04-21 21:15:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Moving to Selection API component.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>111564</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryosuke Niwa">rniwa</who>
    <bug_when>2014-09-15 23:56:19 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Added in https://github.com/w3c/selection-api/commit/a79093963522521859679b2d93ff3d28ab4443c8.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>111600</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Ehsan Akhgari [:ehsan]">ehsan</who>
    <bug_when>2014-09-16 15:44:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Thanks, Ryosuke.  I submitted a small IDL fix: https://github.com/w3c/selection-api/pull/10</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>