23894 2013-11-22 23:51:25 +0000 MUSTs and MAYs in a Note in 3.3 Extension Attributes 2014-05-15 14:00:32 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XSLT 3.0 Working drafts PC Windows NT CLOSED FIXED P2 trivial --- 1 abel.braaksma mike public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 96734 0 abel.braaksma 2013-11-22 23:51:25 +0000 Editorial. Not sure this falls under the editor's discretion, or whether it is an actual (layout) error in the spec: the second and third paragraph under the first Note under 3.3. Extension Attributes contains several mandatory MUSTs, MAYs, MUST NOTs and a REQUIRED. Since a Note is considered non-normative, and capital MUST/MAY etc are considered normative, this seems to be contradictory. Perhaps only the first paragraph was originally meant as Note? This layout is the same in XSLT 2.0. 96743 1 mike 2013-11-23 10:08:36 +0000 Thanks. The query //note[.//rfc2119] picks up a number of further instances of this inconsistency, which I will fix. 96919 2 mike 2013-11-28 18:22:58 +0000 I have removed all RFC markup from notes. Most of it was doing no harm: it was either "mays" and "shoulds" which don't really have any normative force anyway, or "musts" that explained the consequences of "musts" already stated normatively. But removing the markup avoids any arguments.