23683 2013-10-30 19:07:37 +0000 Investigate restricting sequence<T> to iterables 2014-09-12 03:40:15 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebAppsWG WebIDL unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 annevk cam bzbarsky costan mike public-script-coord public-webapps-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 95570 0 annevk 2013-10-30 19:07:37 +0000 Because then it would match ECMAScript's spread operator which recently changed to exclude objects that have a length and indexable properties. 95575 1 bzbarsky 2013-10-30 20:14:17 +0000 I think this would be quite reasonable, fwiw. 96216 2 bzbarsky 2013-11-13 00:33:48 +0000 Note that if we plan to do this we should do it sooner rather than later before people start depending on the current behavior. c.f. http://crbug.com/314755 and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=937348 and https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124175 96361 3 bzbarsky 2013-11-15 16:15:58 +0000 http://www.w3.org/mid/5286470A.2010404@mit.edu sent about how to properly define this. 111420 4 cam 2014-09-12 03:40:15 +0000 https://github.com/heycam/webidl/commit/1615f240136ae801a8a76ac84ac3fea3fbe68611 made JS -> IDL sequence conversions use @@iterator rather than length and array index properties.