23356 2013-09-25 20:46:36 +0000 Consider making HTMLFieldSetElement.elements a plain HTMLCollection 2013-11-19 22:19:19 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#dom-fieldset-elements P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian ian mike Ms2ger contributor oldest_to_newest 93825 0 contributor 2013-09-25 20:46:36 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/forms.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#dom-fieldset-elements Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#dom-fieldset-elements Referrer: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/ Comment: Consider making HTMLFieldSetElement.elements a plain HTMLCollection Posted from: 87.64.237.177 by ms2ger@gmail.com User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20130609 Firefox/24.0 93826 1 Ms2ger 2013-09-25 20:47:41 +0000 http://logbot.glob.com.au/?c=mozilla%23content#c136004 http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/2543 93827 2 ian 2013-09-25 20:55:22 +0000 The only difference between the spec and this would be dropping support for setting radio button groups from the fieldset elements list using fieldset.elements.foo.value, right? You'd have to instead do fieldset.form.elements.foo.value, and it would only work if you had a form and the fieldset was all in the form and so on? 93906 3 ian 2013-09-26 18:19:24 +0000 Based on IRC conversation, I think the answer to comment 2 is "yes". 96247 4 ian 2013-11-13 21:08:13 +0000 Not sure what that logbot link is supposed to show. The live dom viewer tests shows Safari/Chrome use HTMLFormControlsCollection, IE doesn't even have .elements, and Firefox does HTMLCollection. I don't see why we wouldn't want to do the radio button thing in fieldsets. Based on the above, I'm leaning towards WONTFIX. Is there any further information I should consider? 96555 5 ian 2013-11-19 22:19:19 +0000 Marking WONTFIX per comment 4; please reopen if you disagree.