<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2315</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-09-28 14:08:18 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Where Parts 1 and 2 share topics, what is normative where?</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-09-20 23:10:00 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Structures: XSD Part 1</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P4</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>6531</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2005-09-28 14:08:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>We need a clean story about which constraints are expressed
normatively in part 1 and which in part 2.  This affects 
the definitions of the special simple types, the tableaux,
and every other topic touched on by both parts of the spec.

This issue is attached to just one of the parts, but the
requirement to DECIDE what the story is belongs equally to
both parts.  (Once we decide, we may need to clone this
bug in order to track the task of adjusting the text in
each part to match our story.)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>11899</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2006-09-20 23:10:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This issue was resolved by the adoption of the &apos;1852 proposal&apos; at
the Working Group&apos;s face to face meeting of January 2006 in
St. Petersburg.  The resolution is reflected in the last call
working draft of 17 February 2006.

This issue should have been mark as RESOLVED / FIXED at that
time, but apparently was not.  I am marking it that way now, to
reduce confusion.
</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>