2260 2005-09-16 12:55:50 +0000 [xqueryx] namespace attributes 2005-09-27 09:39:28 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XQueryX 1.0 Last Call drafts PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 davidc jim.melton public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 6322 0 davidc 2005-09-16 12:55:50 +0000 Currently a namespace declaration on a direct element constructor such as <a xmlns:x="a"></a> is encoded using <xqx:attributeConstructor> <xqx:attributeName xqx:prefix="xmlns">x</xqx:attributeName> <xqx:attributeValue>a</xqx:attributeValue> </xqx:attributeConstructor> There is a certain amount of history as to why namespace declarations use xml attribute syntax, but that history doesn't apply here. These are not attributes to the XPath/Xquery data model, and they have a radically different effect on the static context. xmlns: isn't a prefix in the currently known namespaces, so it's a misuse of the xqx:QName type to represent xmlns:x as a Qname with prefix xmlns. XqueryX should have a separate xqx:namespaceName xqx:namespaceValue construct to generate the namespace binding. the schema declaration for xqx:attributeName should have a pattern facet restricting the name not to be xmlns or begin with xmlns: David 6338 1 davidc 2005-09-19 09:47:58 +0000 Actually I note that the example in section 3.4 encodes the namespace declaration as <xqx:attributeName>xmlns:ma</xqx:attributeName> rather than <xqx:attributeName xqx;prefix="xmlns">ma</xqx:attributeName> but that's even worse: it's not valid against the schema which which has base type xs:NCName so can't have a colon. 6360 2 jim.melton 2005-09-20 11:52:06 +0000 Thank you very much for this observation and discussion. I have not yet spent the time to think about this fully, but I'm inclined to agree with your point. We will investigate this more fully and come up with an appropriate way to reprseent namespace declarations. 6460 3 jim.melton 2005-09-26 21:56:02 +0000 We agree with your comment and have modified the XQueryX schema to permit namespace declarations in element constructors through the use of a new element xqx:namespaceDeclaration having subelements xqx:prefix and xqx:uri. This new element will be an alternative within xqx:attributeList. We will also prohibit xqx:attributeConstructor's xqx:attributeName child from taking on the value "xmlns" or values starting with "xmlns:". We have enhanced the XQueryX stylesheet to reflect these changes. Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision. 6467 4 davidc 2005-09-26 22:56:20 +0000 We will also prohibit xqx:attributeConstructor's xqx:attributeName child from taking on the value "xmlns" or values starting with "xmlns:". This is what I suggested but actually you only need to restrict xmlns. xmlns: isn't allowed anyway as the base type of attributeNmae is xs:NCName so doesn't allow :. However I leave the details to the editor and am closing this report anyway. 6479 5 davidc 2005-09-27 09:39:28 +0000 One further comment, even though this is closed It may be best to make the restriction in the stylesheet generating an error if the attribute name is xmlns _and no prefix_. XSD schema can't restrict the content based on the non appearance of an attribute. You probably do need to allow an attribute named fobar:xmlns (ie xqx:prefix="foobar" and content equal to xmlns, as these are allowed even though bad form, xmlns 1.1 says: http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names11/#xmlReserved Though they are not themselves reserved, it is inadvisable to use prefixed names whose LocalPart begins with the letters x, m, l, in any case combination, as these names would be reserved if used without a prefix.