2257 2005-09-16 11:06:27 +0000 [xqueryx] brace groups in element content. 2005-09-26 22:51:27 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XQueryX 1.0 Last Call drafts PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 davidc jim.melton public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 6315 0 davidc 2005-09-16 11:06:28 +0000 Currently (15th september) the stylesheet puts a brace group around each item in the content of a direct element constructor. It should not do this if the item is itself a direct element constructor, ie the xsl:if tests below should be added. <xsl:template match="xqx:elementContent"> <xsl:for-each select="*"> <xsl:if test="not(self::xqx:elementConstructor)"> <xsl:value-of select="$LBRACE"/> </xsl:if> <xsl:apply-templates select="."/> <xsl:if test="not(self::xqx:elementConstructor)"> <xsl:value-of select="$RBRACE"/> </xsl:if> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template> Without this change XqueryX can not express the equivalent of <y><z xmlns:a="a"/></y> the nearest it can get is <y>{<z xmlns:a="a"/>}</y> But these are not equivalent: declare copy-namespaces no-preserve,no-inherit; <y><z xmlns:a="a"/></y> evaluates to <y><z xmlns:a="a"/></y> but declare copy-namespaces no-preserve,no-inherit; <y>{<z xmlns:a="a"/>}</y> evaluates to <y><z/></y> as the copy-namespace declaration has no effect on the directly embedded element constructor in the first example, but does affect (prohibit) the copying of the namespace when the sequence constructed by the enclosed expression is copied in the second example. David 6353 1 jim.melton 2005-09-20 09:57:07 +0000 Thanks for reporting this problem. We will investigate it and produce a solution for a revised XQueryX stylesheet. 6459 2 jim.melton 2005-09-26 21:11:36 +0000 We have made the change that you proposed. Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision. 6466 3 davidc 2005-09-26 22:51:27 +0000 thanks