22559 2013-07-03 17:01:43 +0000 Selecting the Preset XHTML5 + SVG 1.1 + MathML 3.0 + RDFa 1.1 + ITS 2.0 reports warnings about RDFa Lite 1.1 2013-07-09 14:50:29 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML Checker General unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 shane mike+validator mike www-validator-cvs oldest_to_newest 90242 0 shane 2013-07-03 17:01:43 +0000 Selecting this preset should disable the RDFa Lite Warnings, but it does not. Also, I don't really think RDFa Lite 1.1 should be the default configuration for HTML5 nor for XHTML5 when validating. There is just too much functionality outside of Lite. Moreover the RDFa generated by ReSpec is not "Lite". 90467 1 mike 2013-07-09 14:06:44 +0000 (In reply to comment #0) > Selecting this preset should disable the RDFa Lite Warnings, but it does not. Thanks for the report. I broke it accidentally when I added ITS 2.0 support recently, but I've undone the breakage now. So please try it again now at http://validator.w3.org/nu/ and if it's not working as expected please let me know. > > Also, I don't really think RDFa Lite 1.1 should be the default configuration > for HTML5 nor for XHTML5 when validating. There is just too much > functionality outside of Lite. The existing RDFa support in the Nu validator was added relatively recently and I'd really rather we give some more time for people to actually use it and give feedback before we change the defaults in mid-stream. > Moreover the RDFa generated by ReSpec is not "Lite". As far as I know ReSpec doesn't generate RDFa by default. And about the RDFa-included output that ReSpec does generate, I'd wonder if the fact it's generating non-Lite RDFa might because that RDFa support was added to ReSpec before there ever was a RDFa Lite (since RDFa Lite only came along recently). So I'd think that along with whatever options ReSpec provides for generating RDFa-included output, it could provide one more user option for generating that as RDFa Lite, alongside whatever the current option is that's hard-coded to only generate full RDFa. 90473 2 shane 2013-07-09 14:50:29 +0000 Thanks - it looks like this is fixed. As to RDFa Lite mode for ReSpec, I will look into supporting that. However, I know there are features we rely upon that are not supported in Lite so I imagine it is unlikely.