22399 2013-06-18 19:33:44 +0000 [Shadow]: ShadowRoot should have an host property 2013-10-25 06:40:43 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebAppsWG HISTORICAL - Component Model unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 22715 1 esprehn hayato dglazkov dominicc hayato public-webapps-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 89494 0 esprehn 2013-06-18 19:33:44 +0000 ShadowRoot.host should let you walk up the tree to the Document. This is important for doing certain kinds of hit testing (computing offsets) and finding containers. 89699 1 dominicc 2013-06-21 14:22:29 +0000 In the world without shadow encapsulation in which we find ourselves (shadowRoot, olderShadowRoot, etc.) having ShadowRoot.host too makes sense. I believe this was heavily canvassed on an earlier bug. Can we reopen that one? There might be something pertinent already discussed. 90866 2 dglazkov 2013-07-17 19:44:09 +0000 *** Bug 20605 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 94479 3 dglazkov 2013-10-08 17:48:54 +0000 *** Bug 23462 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 94480 4 esprehn 2013-10-08 18:02:06 +0000 What's the status of this? I see lots of other things have made it into the spec recently but this one property is still missing. :( 95284 5 hayato 2013-10-24 08:43:43 +0000 I am okay to add the host property to the ShadowRoot. Is there any objection? If there is no objection in a week, let me add that. 95291 6 hayato 2013-10-24 10:43:17 +0000 If we can add ShadowRoot.host, it might be also okay add ShadowRoot.olderShadowRoot. See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20260. They are similar in a sense of encapsulation. Actually ShadowRoot.olderShadowRoot has already been implemented in blink behind the flag. 95333 7 hayato 2013-10-25 03:38:10 +0000 Let me add ShadowRoot.host to the spec. I think We don't have a clear reason to reject ShadowRoot.host if we allow ShadowRoot.olderShadowRoot. The spec has ShadowRoot.olderShadowRoot, which was already implemented in blink behind the flag. 95338 8 hayato 2013-10-25 06:40:43 +0000 I've updated the spec: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/rev/6743f1ace623 If you have a concern, please let me know that.