2229 2005-09-14 19:27:42 +0000 R-237: Possible errors in the S4S 2009-04-21 19:21:38 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.1 only All All CLOSED FIXED important, work resolved P4 normal --- 2122 3997 2207 1 sandygao cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 6253 0 sandygao 2005-09-14 19:27:42 +0000 The following are a few things that look like errors in the current schema-for- schema posted on http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.xsd Some of them have been discussed here in the past or even mentioned in the errata, but don't seem to be reflected in the posted xsd.... They are all minor things, but they all do get in the way of actually using the schema-for-schema to validate schemas. Here is my list of changes: 1. finalDefault needs to permit "list" and "union" 2. the type of the <element> element in an <all> group needs to be given a name so that it is legal to use the type in both a base type and a restriction when using the allModel (otherwise it breaks one of the particle-valid (restriction) rules). 3. The regular expressions that describe integrity constraint xpaths need to be modified to permit whitespaces in certain places, as discussed in one of the errata. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003JulSep/0087.html 12988 1 sandygao 2006-11-22 04:25:53 +0000 #1 and #2 were already fixed. Proposal: to relax the type definition of identity constraint XPaths by removing the pattern entirely, because the pattern is not sufficient for ensureing the validity of the XPath expression. Resolution: adopted at 2006-11-17 telecon.