22195 2013-05-29 07:08:00 +0000 "script element: No role" — it strikes me that <head>, <style>, <script>, <noscript> when scripting is enabled, etc, should probably have aria-hidden=true implied and forced (strong semantic). 2015-06-17 04:11:52 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG HTML5 spec unspecified Other other RESOLVED INVALID http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#table-aria-strong nonEditorialChange P2 editorial --- 21428 1 faulkner.steve faulkner.steve contributor faulkner.steve ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 88366 0 faulkner.steve 2013-05-29 07:08:00 +0000 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #21428 +++ Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/ Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#table-aria-strong Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#table-aria-strong Comment: "script element: No role" — it strikes me that <head>, <style>, <script>, <noscript> when scripting is enabled, etc, should probably have aria-hidden=true implied and forced (strong semantic). Posted from: 2620:0:1000:147d:554:229d:92fd:f7b8 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.3 Safari/537.36 this appears to be a) wrong or b)redundnant review https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/739ba43e644bb1dd29c873d1b4cefa54fc5bd6c3 and revert in necessary 120858 1 faulkner.steve 2015-06-09 22:13:36 +0000 no longer relevant to HTML spec