2212 2005-09-14 19:14:58 +0000 R-220: Problem with erratum E1-17 2009-04-21 19:25:08 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.0 only All All CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 sandygao ht www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 6233 0 sandygao 2005-09-14 19:14:58 +0000 E1-17 changes the definition of Type Derivation OK (Complex) and Type Derivation OK (Simple) to require the type defns being checked to be named. This change results in an unintended and negative side-effect, namely that anonymous types can't be used at all, even for top-level element declarations. So for example, the following derivation is _not_ conformant any more: <xs:element name="elt"> <xs:simpleType> <xs:restriction base="xs:string"/> <xs:simpleType> <xs:element> <xs:complexType name="base"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="elt" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:sequence> <xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="derived"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:restriction base="base"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="elt"/> <xs:sequence> <xs:restriction> <xs:complexContent> <xs:complexType> See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/2003Dec/0000.html 6422 1 sandygao 2005-09-23 04:05:22 +0000 E1-54 [1] supersedes E1-17. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#e1-54 Propose to mark this one as resolved/fixed. 6538 2 sandygao 2005-09-28 14:27:58 +0000 Discussed at 2005-09-23 telecon and decided this was already fixed in the published 2E recommendation, with erratum E2-54, which supersedes E1-17.