<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2211</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-09-14 19:14:25 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>R-219: Does section 3.11.1 of part 1 need to refer to list, union?</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-04-21 19:25:08 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Structures: XSD Part 1</component>
          <version>1.0 only</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>6232</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-09-14 19:14:25 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>At the 2003/11/20 telecon, the following question arose: 

Does section 3.11.1 of Structures need to explicitly cover lists and unions?

See: http://www.w3.org/2003/11/20-xmlschema-irc#T17-22-00</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>6956</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-10-28 18:56:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Discussed at 2005-10-28 telecon [1].

Resolved: Make sure we have an issue in bugzilla on list/union equality (bug 
2423) and mark this issue as overtaken by the more general issue.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2005Oct/0022.html</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>