<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2203</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-09-14 19:07:48 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>R-211: The {attributes} property on the Annotation schema component</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-04-21 19:21:36 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Structures: XSD Part 1</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>medium, easy, annotation cluster</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P4</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>6220</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-09-14 19:07:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The {attributes} property on the Annotation schema component is described as &quot;A 
sequence of attribute information items, namely those allowed by the attribute 
wildcard in the type definition for the &lt;annotation&gt; item itself or for the 
enclosing items which correspond to the component within which the annotation 
component is located.&quot;

http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2002/09/xmlschema-1/structures-with-
errata.html#cAnnotations 

http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2002/09/xmlschema-1/structures-with-
errata.html#declare-annotation 

The XML Information Set spec, on the other hand, defines the [attributes] 
property of element information items as containing a set, not a sequence, of 
attribute information items.

http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/#infoitem.element 

I think the XML Schema spec should probably similarly specify a set, not a 
sequence, of attribute information items.

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003JanMar/0089.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12476</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-14 14:40:46 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>A proposal to resolve this issue has been placed at 
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.bannotations.200610.html
(member-only links) for review and action by the WG.
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12507</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-17 09:01:10 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>IIRC the reason for switching to a sequence for {attributes} was so that a (partial) ordering could be relied on, i.e. if an annotation A derives from a higher element than an annotation B, it would precede that annotation in {attributes}</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12581</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2006-10-21 20:43:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The proposal mentioned in comment #1 was accepted by the WG during
its meeting of 20 October 2006.  The changes have been integrated
into the status quo document and will appear in due course in the
next published working draft.
</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>