2193 2005-09-14 19:01:12 +0000 R-200: Problem with erratum E1-18 2012-12-04 00:53:12 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.0 only All Windows 3.1 NEW needsDrafting P2 normal --- 1 sandygao David_E3 www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 6207 0 sandygao 2005-09-14 19:01:12 +0000 According to the recent discussion about list of IDs, maybe the intention was that only restriction should be considered for these types. This might be OK for ID/IDREF, but it'd be a behavior change for ENTITY/ENTITIES types. (The current wording in the datatype spec indicates that lists/unions of ENTITY are also considered as values of type ENTITY.) See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2003Jan/0009.html 6208 1 sandygao 2005-09-14 19:01:20 +0000 Discussed and resolved at the May 23, 2003 telecon. RESOLVED: direct TF to classify R-200 as error with erratum. RESOLVED: direct editors to correct the error by covering the list and union cases in the obvious may.