<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>21717</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2013-04-16 13:21:51 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Not used: XQST0124</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2013-06-04 16:39:08 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XQuery 3.0</component>
          <version>Candidate Recommendation</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows NT</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Christian Gruen">christian.gruen</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Jonathan Robie">jonathan.robie</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>86288</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Christian Gruen">christian.gruen</who>
    <bug_when>2013-04-16 13:21:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Error code XQST0124 is not used anywhere in the current XQ30 specification. It states that

  &quot;It is a static error if the name of a feature in require-feature or prohibit-feature is not recognized by the implementation.&quot;

Instead, the description of XQST0123 is referenced once:

  &quot;It is a static error if the name of a feature in require-feature is not recognized by the implementation.&quot;

Next, there seems to be no dedicated error code for options in the &quot;http://www.w3.org/2012/xquery&quot; namespace. Maybe one of the two above was supposed to fill this gap?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>87654</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Robie">jonathan.robie</who>
    <bug_when>2013-05-14 15:34:34 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This is no longer in the internal XQuery 3.0 text. I checked in a query that looks for unused error codes or references to error codes that do not exist, and removed these.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>87674</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Christian Gruen">christian.gruen</who>
    <bug_when>2013-05-14 18:04:05 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Thanks for the removal.

I believe that it still needs to be clarified what is going to happen if an option in the default options namespace (&quot;http://www.w3.org/2012/xquery&quot;) is unknown. An example:

  declare option unknown &quot;x&quot;; ()

Maybe XQST0124 could be used for that case?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>88621</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Robie">jonathan.robie</who>
    <bug_when>2013-06-04 15:18:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; Maybe XQST0124 could be used for that case?

Sounds good to me.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>88632</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonathan Robie">jonathan.robie</who>
    <bug_when>2013-06-04 16:39:08 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; (In reply to comment #2)
&gt; &gt; Maybe XQST0124 could be used for that case?
&gt; 
&gt; Sounds good to me.

The Working Group agrees. I will change this in the spec.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>