2159 2005-09-14 15:23:54 +0000 R-163: Inconsistency between S4S and schema component information re: annotations 2012-12-04 00:53:54 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.0 only All Windows 3.1 NEW needsDrafting P2 normal --- 1 sandygao David_E3 www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 6137 0 sandygao 2005-09-14 15:23:54 +0000 The Schema for Schemas and the Rec should be consistent wrt where annotations are allowed. The Schema for Schemas permits an annotation on any element/attribute element, but the Rec is missing annotation information for some schema component definitions. See the following: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002AprJun/0170.html as well as an earlier posting with an example: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002JulSep/0020.html 6138 1 sandygao 2005-09-14 15:24:10 +0000 Resolved at the July 2000 f2f to: - add a clarification to the errata doc indicating that annotations get lost in this situation - integrate this case of lost annotations into RQ-130