<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>21423</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2013-03-28 16:32:37 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>English numbering doesn&apos;t conform to W3C example</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2013-05-01 09:10:28 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XQuery 3 &amp; XPath 3 Test Suite</component>
          <version>Working drafts</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sorin Nasoi">spungi</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="O&apos;Neil Delpratt">oneil</assigned_to>
          <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>paul</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>85098</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sorin Nasoi">spungi</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-28 16:32:37 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The test case &quot;format-date-en126&quot; from &quot;fn-format-date&quot; test set:
    format-date( xs:date(&quot;1990-12-01&quot;), &quot;[YW]&quot; )
expects:
    ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND NINTY
It should be allowed for an implementation to produce:
    ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY

Alternatively, the FOTS could be augmented to expect alternate results since there is no specification for exactly how the W, w, or Ww presentation modifiers are to behave.

Same issue affects tests cases format-date-en127, format-date-en128, format-date-en132, format-date-en133, and format-date-en134 from the same test set.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>85112</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-28 17:45:16 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I agree that both results should be acceptable.

(Perhaps one result is more appropriate for en-GB and the other for en-US, but we don&apos;t need to specify that.)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>85342</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2013-04-01 23:09:58 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 21496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>87072</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2013-05-01 09:10:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Changed the tests to make the &quot;and&quot; optional, in deference to US practice. Sorry, practise.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>