<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>21340</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2013-03-19 22:23:15 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Support longdesc extension in the validator</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2013-03-24 01:06:20 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML Checker</product>
          <component>General</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.w3.org/TR/html-longdesc/</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Charles McCathieNevile">chaals</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike+validator</assigned_to>
          <cc>mike</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="qa-dev tracking">www-validator-cvs</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>84660</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Charles McCathieNevile">chaals</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-19 22:23:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Allow validation of HTML that includes the longdesc attribute, as specified in the extension spec.

- Valid on img elements
- Must be a valid URI (can be relative)

(I doubt this is a surprise, but a formal bug makes it easy for me to find).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>84890</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Charles McCathieNevile">chaals</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-23 23:52:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Seems support is there. Is there a way to validate that the content is a &quot;Valid URL potentially surrounded by spaces&quot; (or whatever the technical term is)? Should I file a new bug for that?

Thanks for the support, by the way.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>84892</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2013-03-24 01:06:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; Seems support is there. Is there a way to validate that the content is a
&gt; &quot;Valid URL potentially surrounded by spaces&quot; (or whatever the technical term
&gt; is)? Should I file a new bug for that?

Should be working as expected now (I had just forgotten to actually push the change from the repo to the validator.)

&gt; Thanks for the support, by the way.

Cheers :)</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>