2130 2005-09-09 16:24:17 +0000 R-141: Changes suggested re: dateTime order relation 2007-03-29 18:48:53 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.0 only All All ASSIGNED needsAgreement P2 normal --- 1 sandygao cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 6069 0 sandygao 2005-09-09 16:24:17 +0000 In section 3.2.7.3 on the order relation of dateTime, at B.1, it says: 1.. If P[i] and Q[i] are both not specified, continue to the next i 2.. If P[i] is not specified and Q[i] is, or vice versa, stop and return P <> Q This doesn't make any sense to me. When could P[i] or Q[i] be "not specified"? In dateTime all fields are specified. When things like gYearMonth appeal to the dateTime order, they do so by saying eg "the order relation on gYearMonth values is the order relation on their starting instants", so in this case also all fields are totally specified. I think the above two sentences should be deleted. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002AprJun/0044.html 6070 1 sandygao 2005-09-09 16:34:15 +0000 See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003AprJun/0020.html Discussed at the May 2003 f2f. Decided to classify as error w/erratum and come back later for detailed consideration.