21044 2013-02-19 09:05:58 +0000 HTMLImageElement's constructor should use optional arguments 2013-03-14 00:33:49 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified All All RESOLVED FIXED https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=842376 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21046 P2 normal Unsorted 1 Ms2ger ian ehsan eoconnor ian mike contributor oldest_to_newest 83313 0 Ms2ger 2013-02-19 09:05:58 +0000 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #20554 +++ HTMLImageElement's constructor is currently defined as: [NamedConstructor=Image(), NamedConstructor=Image(unsigned long width), NamedConstructor=Image(unsigned long width, unsigned long height)] interface HTMLImageElement : HTMLElement { ... }; It can probably simplified like this: [NamedConstructor=Image(optional unsigned long width, optional unsigned long height)] interface HTMLImageElement : HTMLElement { ... }; 84380 1 contributor 2013-03-14 00:33:49 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r7755. Check-in comment: Clean up more IDL since WebIDL now supports better ways to say this http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7754&to=7755