<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>20820</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2013-01-29 18:33:50 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>congestion control of data and audio/video</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2014-10-28 18:47:37 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebRTC Working Group</product>
          <component>WebRTC API</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows NT</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Matthew Kaufman">matthew.kaufman</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Web RTC Working Group">public-webrtc</assigned_to>
          <cc>fluffy</cc>
    
    <cc>harald</cc>
    
    <cc>public-webrtc</cc>
    
    <cc>w3c-bugzilla</cc>
          
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>82303</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Matthew Kaufman">matthew.kaufman</who>
    <bug_when>2013-01-29 18:33:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>There is no specification within this document nor in any of its normative references explaining how one must implement interoperable congestion control, in particular how congestion control must interact between the data channels and the audio and video streams.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>89584</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Cullen Jennings">fluffy</who>
    <bug_when>2013-06-19 13:05:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I think we need a chain of normative references to the circuit breaker spec.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>89646</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Harald Alvestrand">harald</who>
    <bug_when>2013-06-20 12:51:07 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The circuit-breaker spec:

draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers

Normative reference from:

draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage

Normative reference from:

draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview

Earlier, we have had qualms with making a normative reference to -overview, because it would pull in a lot of patent policy sensitive requirements (including, possibly, the video codec). An informative reference sounds like a non-controversial addition.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>114165</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Harald Alvestrand">harald</who>
    <bug_when>2014-10-28 18:47:37 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Closing as &quot;this has to be solved in the IETF&quot;.

We do have a normative dependency on rtcweb-transport.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>