2079 2005-09-09 03:13:43 +0000 R-089: Is a trailing decimal point permitted for integer? 2009-04-21 19:24:58 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.0 only All All CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 sandygao cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 5969 0 sandygao 2005-09-09 03:13:43 +0000 According to section 3.13.1, "integer is derived from decimal by fixing the value of fractionDigits to be 0." But a decimal with fractionDigits of 0 can still have a trailing decimal point (see section 3.2.3.1). However, the Lexical representation of integer described in section 3.3.13.1 doesn't mention that a trailing decimal point is permitted. Does 3.3.13.1 implicitly describe an additional pattern facet that is also applied to the decimal datatype in deriving the integer datatype, or is 3.3.13 intended to be a complete description, while 3.3.13.1 is intended to be expository in nature? According to section 3.3, "the complete definitions of the built-in derived datatypes are provided in Appendix A." But the definition for integer that appears in the Schema for Datatype Definitions in Appendix A does not prohibit a trailing decimal point from appearing on an integer value through an additional pattern facet. Given this, is 3.3.13.1 in error? See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0099.html 5970 1 sandygao 2005-09-09 03:14:10 +0000 Discussed at the Feb. 14 concall: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Feb/0087.html Resolution The WG resolved that a trailing decimal point is not permitted, and the editors will draft an erratum changing the schema for schemas, adding a pattern facet to the derivation of integer. April 5: the WG reviewed proposed erratum text and decided that it needed to be revised to add a replacement for the first sentence of section 3.3.13. See proposed text at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Sep/0121.html Sept. 26 concall: RESOLVED: approve the correction for R-89 as drafted. Erratum E2-43 added.