<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2077</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-09-09 03:10:55 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>R-087: Error in section 3.4.2 of Structures</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-04-21 19:24:57 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Structures: XSD Part 1</component>
          <version>1.0 only</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5965</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-09-09 03:10:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Should the following description in XML Representation Summary: complexType 
Element Information Item be changed from:

&quot;2.1.2 otherwise a wildcard whose {process contents} and {annotation} are those 
of the complete wildcard, and whose {namespace constraint} is the intensional 
union of the {namespace constraint} of the effective wildcard and of the base 
wildcard, as defined in Attribute Wildcard Union (213.10.6).&quot; 

to:

&quot;2.1.2 otherwise a wildcard whose {process contents} and {annotation} are those 
of the complete wildcard, and whose {namespace constraint} is the intensional 
union of the {namespace constraint} of the complete wildcard and of the base 
wildcard, as defined in Attribute Wildcard Union (213.10.6).&quot; 

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0083.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5966</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-09-09 03:11:21 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Henry&apos;s response: Yes.

Discussed at the Apr. 26 telecon:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Apr/0084.html.

Resolution:
The WG resolved to classify R-87 as an error and instruct HST to draft erratum 
for R-87 substituting &quot;complete wildcard&quot; for &quot;effective wildcard&quot; in XML 
Representation Summary: complexType Element Information Item.

Erratum E1-30 added.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>