2074 2005-09-09 03:06:19 +0000 R-084: Can final="extension" for simpleType? 2012-12-04 00:52:27 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.0 only All Windows 3.1 NEW needsDrafting P2 normal --- 1 sandygao David_E3 www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 5960 0 sandygao 2005-09-09 03:06:19 +0000 The Datatypes rec and the Schema for Datatypes do not allow the value "extension" for the final attribute of a simpleType. However, section 3.4.6 of the Structures rec (under Derivation Valid (Extension)) says: 2 If the {base type definition} is a simple type definition, then all of the following must be true: 2.1 The {content type} must be the same simple type definition. 2.2 The {final} of the {base type definition} must not contain extension. It seems that 2.2 will always be true. Is this an oversight? See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0067.html 5961 1 sandygao 2005-09-09 03:07:06 +0000 See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0068.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0069.html Resolution: Resolved at the March 8 telecon to class R-84 as clarification with erratum and change the Structures spec to agree with Datatypes as regards final='extension' on simple types. 6549 2 sandygao 2005-09-28 15:15:15 +0000 Discussed at 2005-09-28 F2F meeting. RESOLVED: Change the component of 2074 to Datatypes, remain as needs drafting, reassign to cmsmcq@w3.org [11:14] ht: ... record a new resolution so that it is a direction to bring 1.0 datatypes in to line with the change agreed for 1.1, i.e. that {final} may include 'extension', and relevant comments about its use. 7011 3 ht 2005-11-03 14:32:53 +0000 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2234 is related, currently (2005-11-03) comes to the wrong conclusion 7123 4 ht 2005-11-09 16:01:47 +0000 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2438 is the 1.1 fix for this problem