2069 2005-09-09 02:59:49 +0000 R-079: Ambiguity in statements about valid type derivation 2009-04-21 19:21:32 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.0/1.1 both All All CLOSED FIXED thimble, easy, editorial cluster resolved P2 normal --- 1 sandygao cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 5950 0 sandygao 2005-09-09 02:59:49 +0000 In various places in the Structures spec, statements like the following appear: "type definition A must be validly derived from type definition B given its {prohibited substitutions}, as defined in Type Derivation OK (Complex) (213.4.6) (if it is a complex type definition), or given the empty set, as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) (213.14.6) (if it is a simple type definition)." Questions: Which type does each reference of "it" refer to in the paragraph above? There is no constraint for the case where A is a simple type and B is a complex type; how do we check whether the type "string" is a valid derivation from "anyType"? See bullet 2 from: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0049.html 5951 1 sandygao 2005-09-09 02:59:59 +0000 The WG resolved to classify R-79 as an error, at the March 14 telecon 15198 2 sandygao 2007-05-25 13:30:47 +0000 Discussed at 2007-05-18 telecon. Determined this issue also applies to schema 1.1, and it is an editorial issue. Marking it accordingly. 18581 3 David_E3 2008-01-25 21:31:30 +0000 Fixed in the course of other revisions.