2064 2005-09-09 02:53:20 +0000 R-075: Potential problem with the rules for maxExclusive 2009-04-21 19:24:56 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.0 only All All CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 sandygao cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 5941 0 sandygao 2005-09-09 02:53:20 +0000 The following example is invalid according to the definition of maxExclusive, which states that "The value of maxExclusive must be in the value space of the base type": <xs:simpleType name="foo"> <xs:restriction base="xs:float">> <xs:maxExclusive value="5"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <xs:simpleType name="bar"> <xs:restriction base="foo"> <xs:maxExclusive value="5"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> Should the example be valid if "fixed" is specified for maxExclusive in the base? See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0041.html 5942 1 sandygao 2005-09-09 02:53:48 +0000 At the 12/20/2001 telecon, the WG decided to treat R-75 as an error and to instruct the editor to change the text to specify that the value of maxExclusive must be in the value space of the base type, or else the same value as the effective maxExclusive facet of the base type (if any). April 5: proposed erratum approved by WG. Erratum E2-39 has been added to the errata doc.