<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2000</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-09-07 19:43:10 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>R-022: Floating Point Issues and IEEE</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-04-21 19:24:49 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Datatypes: XSD Part 2</component>
          <version>1.0 only</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5789</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-09-07 19:43:10 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The datatypes spec has some inconsistencies with IEEE with respect to certain 
special values (such as NaNs). Should it be modified to reflect IEEE semantics? 

See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2001May/0030.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5790</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-09-07 19:43:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>A straw poll was held for the following questions: 

Should bit patterns be allowed to be specified for NaNs? 
Should there be a distinction made between signalling and quiet NaNs? 
Is NaN a value? 
Does NaN compare equal to NaN? 
Should NaNs be comparable to non-NaN values? 
Are -0 and +0 the same value? 
The results of the poll were summarized in the following meeting minutes: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2001Jul/0014.html 

No firm decisions made to date.

Status 2002/01: Dave P. and Ashok Malhotra have proposed the following 
resolution/text:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Jan/0066.html 

Further discussion:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Jan/0101.html 
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5791</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Sandy Gao">sandygao</who>
    <bug_when>2005-09-07 19:44:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The WG resolved that this should be classified as an error, and the editors are 
to prepare final wording for an erratum that reflects the decisions made at the 
02/01 telecon:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Feb/0009.html 

Proposed erratum text reviewed at the March 28 telecon. The WG noted a possible 
contradiction in the definition of zero in the erratum for R-22 with our 
decision on R-97 and concluded that this erratum text is not yet ready, and 
instructed the editors to deal with R-22 and R-97 in the same erratum.

Status 04/24: New erratum text proposed: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Mar/0131.html 

Status 05/02: Revised text approved.

Erratum E2-40 added.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>